May 25th, at 1: Of course it will. I have personally dealt with a host of not only wonderful feminists, but also wonderful women who had rejected the feminist label but were doing wonderful work about sex slavery, class privilege, human rights, etc.
Some examples of feminist analysis on sexual violence Taken from Mariangela Di Domenico, La violence faite aux femmes: These feminists were the first to analyze sexual violence against women from a socio-political perspective. They alerted the public to a problem which, prior to their work, had received scant attention.
What little information there had been, was presented through the lens of psycho-biological determinism. Due to the theoretical nature and complexity of the analysis found in the feminist literature, we have had to limit ourselves to the key events. Also, we have chosen to focus on certain authors we judged to be particularly significant.
Because feminism is a practice as well as a theory, it is clear that a study of the writing on its own will provide only a glimpse of the scope and richness of the analysis developed by this movement.
This paper is divided into sections that group authors representing the major currents of feminist analysis of male violence. During the 70s, for example, writers accorded a predominant role to socio-political structures; since the 80s, a more global vision has emerged, in which sexuality, the construction of heterosexuality and the social control of women constitute the main elements.
Feminist analysis based on a study of socio-political structures Generally speaking, analysis produced by feminists during the 70s—a period that has come to be known as the second wave of feminism—accorded little place to the direct as opposed to cultural means of oppressing women.
The use of force was not as a rule understood as a direct means of coercion employed by men as a group to dominate and oppress women as a group. The source of male power and domination over women was located rather in the socio-economic and ideological structures of modern capitalism.
According to Millet ,1 Mitchell 2 and Rowbotham ,3 for example, it is economic and political institutions such as the family, marriage, military-industrial complex, technology, finance and universities that ensure male domination over women.
In their view, since these structures guarantee and legitimize the unequal power relations between men and women, men would have little need to resort to physical violence, coercion and repression to subordinate women.
Her work, often somewhat tinged with biological determinism, suggests that physical force is a structuring element in the antagonistic relations between men and women.
Millet, in her book, Sexual Politicsmoreover, also states that in the end, all power resides in the use of force. This initial theoretical work on the legitimizing of violence in patriarchal society was followed closely by the work of authors such as Griffin ,6 Brownmiller ,7 and Daly 8 who launched the debate on sexual violence.
The first articles on rape appeared in feminist publications in the 70s, and rape, at least in the United States, became the feminist issue of the day.
First, it showed that the construction of femininity makes women fragile and vulnerable, and consequently, less able to defend themselves from attack. It is clear, according to the author of this important article, that rape must not be understood as a sexual act, but as an act of domination over women.
Rape is perhaps the most efficient form of social exclusion. Important contributions to the discussion were subsequently made by Brownmiller 10 in the United States and Clark and Lewis 11 in Canada, who elaborated on the various aspects of this crime.
Confronted with a virtual absence of writing on the subject, Brownmiller researched for four years to come up with a description of rape, including its existence in law and culture. The study also covers the role of rape in literature, the media and in wartime.
Brownmiller demonstrated that this crime is more than an individual act committed by one man against one woman; it is a powerful mechanism of male control over women. She defined rape as an exercise of power and intimidation through which men maintain women in a state of fear.Women of Color and Feminism: Seal Studies [Maythee Rojas] on regardbouddhiste.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
In this Seal Studies title, author and professor Maythee Rojas offers a look at the intricate crossroads of being a woman of color. Women of Color and Feminism tackles the question of how women of color experience feminism.
A literary movement that started in the late s and s and originated in reaction to traditional criticism that new critics saw as largely concerned with matters extraneous to the text, e.g., with the biography or psychology of the author or the work's relationship to literary history.
Lesbian feminism presented one way for women to free themselves from both male domination and heterosexism. Its analysis of society was based on two central claims. The first was an assertion that heterosexuality encompassed much more than a form of sexual desire, that it also functioned as an.
How is socialist feminism different from other types of feminism? Feminist writers and theorists have provided in-depth analysis of the underlying beliefs of feminist theory. In her book Tidal Wave: How Women Changed America at Century's End (compare prices). This guide stresses the systematic causal analysis of gender inequality.
The analytical questions raised and the readings listed consider why and how gender inequality arises, varies across and within societies, persists over generations, produces conformity by individuals and institutions, resists change, and sometimes changes dramatically.
An examination of the possibilities for libertarian feminism, taking the feminist thought of the 19th century radical individualists as an example and a guide. We find that the radical libertarian critique of statism and the radical feminist critique of patriarchy are complementary, not contradictory, and we discuss some of the confusions that lead many libertarians--including many libertarian.