Grahame Baker-Smith "Far off, like a perfect pearl, one can see the city of God.
It is the parenthesis that fills verses It comes in the middle of the table of nations and, in a sense, interrupts it. These verses deal, not with the general movements of peoples and nations, but with one particular descendant of Cush, Nimrod, who is said to have been the founder of the first world empire.
Here is the first place in the Bible where the word "kingdom" occurs. Significantly, it is used, not of God's kingdom as it is laterbut of this first rival kingdom of Nimrod. This matter was obviously of great importance to Moses, for a related parenthesis occurs in the first nine verses of chapter 11, in the story of the tower of Babel.
What is so significant about Nimrod? The fact that he established cities and built a kingdom is important, of course. But there is much more that can be said. Nimrod was the first person to become a "mighty" man. Our text calls attention to this by using The ideal puritan society essay adjective "mighty" three times in describing him: The adjective also occurs in a similar way in 1 Chronicles 1: Why is this emphasized?
Is it good or bad? A little thought will show that it is bad.
The empire of Babylon under Nimrod was an affront both to God and man, an affront to God in that it sought to do without God Gen. Martin Luther was on the right track when he suggested that this is the way the word "hunter" should be interpreted. This is not talking about Nimrod's ability to hunt wild game.
He was not a hunter of animals. He was a hunter of men--a warrior. It was through his ability to fight and kill and rule ruthlessly that his kingdom of Euphrates valley city states was consolidated. One commentator renders this paragraph: He was an arrogant tyrant, defiant before the face of the Lord; wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod, the mighty despot, haughty before the face of the Lord.
These make up one great City.
Barnhouse, The Invisible War Here we have a great city. But it is great, not as Jerusalem is great as God's citybut great in its defiance of God.
This is man's city, the secular city. It is of man, by man, and for man's glory. The later Babylon of Nebuchadnezzar is the clearest biblical illustration of these elements.
It is about Nebuchadnezzar, who embodies the secular city, and God, who operates through Daniel and his friends. The key to the Book of Daniel is in the opening verses which say that after Nebuchadnezzar had besieged and conquered Jerusalem though it was "the Lord [who] gave Jehoaikim. This was Nebuchadnezzar's way of saying that his gods were stronger than Jehovah.
And so it seemed! God had certainly permitted Nebuchadnezzar to triumph over his own people in punishment for their sins.
One evening Nebuchadnezzar had a dream that involved a great image. It was of gold, silver, brass, and iron. The head was of gold.
This represented the kingdom of Nebuchadnezzar and was God's way of acknowledging that Babylon was indeed magnificent. But, as God went on to point out, Babylon would be succeeded by another kingdom represented by the silver arms and chest of the figure, that kingdom by another represented by the figure's brass middle portions, and then that by a kingdom represented by the legs of iron.
It was only at the end of this period that the eternal kingdom of God in Christ would come and overthrow all others, grow and fill the earth. In this vision God was telling Nebuchadnezzar that he was not as important as he thought he was and that it was God Himself who rules history.THE TRAGEDY OF THE COMMON REVISITED by Beryl Crowe () reprinted in MANAGING THE COMMONS by Garrett Hardin and John Baden W.H.
Freeman, ; ISBN The Puritan Guilt in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Society Essay Words | 8 Pages. a time of great prudishness in America but born a man Nathaniel Hawthorne that would put the Puritan society and their way to the test.
Editor’s Note: The original essay below, by New Atlantis contributing editor Matthew B. Crawford, was published in Mr. Crawford has expanded the essay into a bestselling book — Shop Class as Soulcraft: An Inquiry into the Value of Work — published in by Penguin.
To read excerpts from and reviews of the book, and to see interviews with Mr. Crawford, click here. The Puritan Society was a very restrictive, repressive, and socially constrictive one. Every member of the society had a strict role to fill.
Any one who fell outside of their appropriate role in society was shunned, insulted, exiled, or tortured to death/5(2). This is cool! There’s been this undercurrent in your writings on society and biology for a while now, and I think it’s a radically sane position.
As an amusing side note, in a science essay called "The Sight Of Home" Isaac Asimov once calculated how far an interstellar colony would have to be from Terra before Sol was too dim to be seen in the colony's night sky with the naked regardbouddhiste.com out that colonies further than 20 parsecs (65 light-years) cannot see Mankind's Homestar, because Sol's apparent magnitude is dimmer than 6.